Most consumer refunds require a person to notice a deadline, find a claim form, and prove they belong to the class. This one does not. The Federal Trade Commission has identified who is owed money in the Grubhub case and is sending it — which shifts the entire risk of the program onto a single question of whether the recipient notices what arrives.
What the payments cover
The FTC announced on August 12 that it is sending payments totaling more than $23.8 million to drivers harmed by Grubhub’s deceptive earnings claims and to diners harmed by the company’s misleading and unlawful conduct. The payments are going to 640,038 people.
The underlying case, brought with the Illinois Attorney General, covered several distinct practices. Grubhub was alleged to have made deceptive claims about how much drivers could earn, to have blocked diners from their accounts and gift card balances, and to have listed restaurants on its platform without those restaurants’ permission — a practice that produced orders restaurants had not agreed to fulfill and delivery experiences diners then blamed on the restaurant.
Two groups are therefore being paid out of the same distribution for different injuries: drivers who took work based on earnings figures that did not hold up, and diners on the consumer side of the platform’s conduct.
Free retirement updates: Miss an enrollment or claim deadline and it may be gone. Our free Retirement Shield newsletter keeps readers ahead of the ones that matter. Get the free newsletter.
Two clocks, and they run at different speeds
The FTC is using two payment methods, and each carries its own expiration. Most recipients will receive a check in the mail, and the commission instructs check recipients to cash within 90 days, as indicated on the check itself. Recipients paid through PayPal have a much shorter window: 30 days to redeem the payment.
The 30-day PayPal clock is the one worth flagging to anyone who might be affected. A PayPal notification is easy to mistake for marketing, easy to leave unopened in an email account a person no longer checks daily, and gone in a month. A paper check at least announces itself as a check. Recipients with questions can reach the refund administrator, Analytics Consulting LLC, at 1-888-446-4992, and the FTC maintains a dedicated page for this distribution.
What the FTC has not published is a per-person amount. Dividing the total across the recipient count produces an average in the neighborhood of $37, but that is arithmetic performed on two published figures, not a distribution the FTC has described. Individual payments in a program covering two different harm categories will vary, and no one should treat an average as the amount they are owed.
Why an automatic payment still gets missed
Automatic distribution solves the hardest problem in consumer redress — people not knowing they qualify — and creates a smaller one in its place. A payment nobody applied for is a payment nobody is watching for.
The likeliest ways this money goes unclaimed are mundane. A Grubhub driver from several years ago has moved and the check follows an old address. A diner’s PayPal account is tied to an email they abandoned. A check arrives, gets set aside as probable junk mail, and expires on the counter. The FTC’s decision to run a second and third round of payments in an unrelated case, years after the first, is direct evidence of how often this happens.
The countermeasure is small: anyone who drove for Grubhub or ordered through it during the relevant period should keep an eye on both the mail and the email address attached to their PayPal account for the next several weeks, and open anything referencing the FTC or Analytics Consulting.
The rule that separates a real refund from an impersonation
Publicized federal refunds reliably attract people pretending to administer them, and a program in which 640,038 strangers are expecting unsolicited money is a rich target.
The distinguishing rule is simple and admits no exceptions: a legitimate FTC refund never requires the recipient to pay anything. There is no fee to release a payment, no tax to remit in advance, no charge to verify identity. Nor will the FTC or its administrator ask for a bank password, a Social Security number, or a code texted to a phone in order to complete a payment that is already on its way.
Anyone uncertain about a message they receive can check it against the FTC’s own list of active refund programs, which names the administrator and payment method for each case the agency is currently distributing. If the details in a message do not match what the FTC publishes, the message is not from the FTC.
This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by a human editor. Figures are linked to their primary sources; where a claim could not be verified from the public record, we say so.
More Financial Reading
