Money, explained for the rest of us.

Get our free daily email →

Treasury proposed making filers swear to citizenship before the refundable part of four credits is paid

By

Image Credit: Freepik/

A proposed regulation from the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service would require tax filers to certify their citizenship or immigration status before the refunded part of four common tax credits could be paid out. The rule, opened for public comment in August, targets only the slice of a credit that exceeds what a filer actually owes in tax — the part that arrives as a refund check rather than a smaller bill. For households that count on the Earned Income Tax Credit or the Child Tax Credit to boost a spring refund, that distinction is the whole story: it decides whether the proposal touches them at all, and how much new paperwork could show up on a future return.

What the “Refunded Portion” of a Credit Actually Means

The refunded portion is the part of a tax credit that pays out as cash after the credit has already wiped out whatever federal income tax was owed. Most filers think of a credit only as something that lowers a bill, but four specific credits work differently once the liability hits zero: the adoption credit, the child tax credit, the American opportunity credit and the earned income tax credit can each pay out more than a filer owes. That excess is what lands as an actual refund deposit instead of a smaller balance due, and it is exactly the piece a new federal proposal would restrict.

Under the proposal, released by the Treasury Department and the IRS on August 19, 2026, that excess amount would be treated as a federal public benefit under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, the mid-1990s welfare-reform law that already restricts most federal benefits to citizens, nationals and a defined list of qualified aliens. A filer who doesn’t meet that standard could still claim the non-refundable share of any of the four credits — the portion that simply reduces a tax bill toward zero — under the proposal; only the cash-back excess above that point would be restricted.


Free retirement updates: Miss an enrollment or claim deadline and it may be gone. Our free Retirement Shield newsletter keeps readers ahead of the ones that matter. Get the free newsletter.

The Citizenship Declaration Filers Would Sign

To claim the refunded share of any of the four credits, a filer would need to have been a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, or a qualified alien under federal law on the date the return claiming the credit was filed. Qualified alien status is not open-ended; the category covers a specific list drawn from existing immigration law, including:

  • Lawful permanent residents, meaning green-card holders
  • Asylees and refugees admitted under federal asylum and refugee law
  • Several narrower categories of parolees and status-holders defined elsewhere in federal statute

The return itself would carry a new declaration under the proposal: the filer attests, under penalty of perjury, to meeting that standard before the refunded amount can be paid. Married couples filing jointly get a narrower version of the requirement — only one spouse has to qualify for the household to receive the refunded portion, so a mixed-status couple filing together would not automatically lose the money the way an individual filer in the same position would. The legal theory behind the requirement rests on a Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel opinion concluding that these refund amounts qualify as federal public benefits, a classification spelled out in the regulatory text Treasury filed for public inspection.

Which of the Four Credits Would Actually Feel It

Of the four credits named, the earned income tax credit and the child tax credit touch far more households than the other two, since both are built around low- and middle-income working families rather than a narrower expense like adoption or college tuition. The Earned Income Tax Credit is one of the few in the tax code designed specifically to pay back more than a filer put in, which is exactly why it sits at the center of the proposal. The Child Tax Credit works the same way through the portion known as the Additional Child Tax Credit. The American opportunity credit, aimed at the first four years of college costs, and the adoption credit, which offsets qualified adoption expenses, both carry smaller refundable pieces and reach far fewer filers in a given year. None of the four credits would disappear under the proposal — a filer who doesn’t meet the citizenship or status test could still use any of them to reduce a tax bill to zero, just not to generate money back beyond that point.

Why the Rule Isn’t in Effect Yet

None of this is in effect, and the proposal is written that way on purpose. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent framed the move as closing what he called an abuse of taxpayer-funded benefits, saying in the Treasury Department’s announcement that American taxpayers should not be forced to pay for benefits reserved by law for others. A proposed regulation, though, is not a final one. The companion Federal Register filing sets a written-comment window running through October 5, 2026, with a public hearing scheduled for October 14 before Treasury can move toward a final rule. The proposal itself states that any new eligibility requirement would apply only to tax years ending on or after the date final regulations are published — meaning it has no effect on any return being filed or refunded right now, and would still need to clear the comment period and a final rule before touching an actual tax season. Until that process runs its course, the four credits keep paying out exactly as they do today.


Well before a rule like this reaches anyone’s tax return, other money already sits unclaimed in state and county systems. State unclaimed-property offices hold forgotten refunds, deposits, and old accounts that were never returned to their owners, open class-action settlements still pay out to eligible households that never filed a claim, and circuit-breaker credits reduce a property-tax bill for homeowners and renters below a set income line. Each program is opt-in, no agency mails a check automatically, and the qualifying figures reset every year by state. The Benefits Checklist folds the 2026 limits for each of these programs, the office that handles them in every state, a 50-state directory, and a printable tracker into a single 51-page guide.

This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by a human editor. Figures are linked to their primary sources; where a claim could not be verified from the public record, we say so.


Spotted an error? Tell us at [email protected]. We fix mistakes fast and in the open — see how we work on our standards page.

Get the money news that affects your wallet — free, every weekday morning.

Benefits, taxes, and savings, explained in plain English. Get the free newsletter.

Free from Retirement Shield. Unsubscribe anytime. We never ask for money.