For everyone born in 1960 or later, full retirement age for Social Security is now 67 — and claiming at the earliest possible age of 62 permanently cuts the monthly benefit by about 30 percent. That reduction is not temporary and does not reverse when you get older; it locks in for life. The decision of when to claim is one of the biggest financial choices a retiree makes, and understanding exactly what early claiming costs, and what waiting earns, is the difference between an informed choice and an expensive default.
What full retirement age means now
Full retirement age is the age at which you can claim your full, unreduced Social Security benefit. It has been rising for years, and for those born in 1960 or later it has reached 67. The Social Security Administration lays this out on its benefit reduction page, which shows how claiming before full retirement age reduces the monthly amount. Claim at 62, the earliest age, and someone with a full retirement age of 67 receives about 70 percent of their full benefit — roughly a 30 percent cut — for the rest of their life.
The reduction is graduated, not all-or-nothing. Every month you claim before full retirement age shaves a bit off the benefit, so claiming at 64 costs less than claiming at 62, and claiming at 66 costs less still. There is no single “right” age, but the further before 67 you file, the larger and more permanent the reduction.
Free retirement updates: Keep more of your Social Security and savings with plain-English updates on the changes, deadlines, and costly mistakes retirees miss. Subscribe free.
What waiting past 67 earns
Just as claiming early reduces the benefit, claiming later increases it. For each year you delay past full retirement age, Social Security adds delayed retirement credits worth about 8 percent a year, up to age 70. Waiting from 67 to 70 can raise the monthly benefit by roughly 24 percent above the full amount. After 70 there is no additional increase, so there is no reason to wait beyond that age.
Put the two ends together and the spread is dramatic: a person who claims at 62 can receive a monthly benefit around 30 percent below their full amount, while someone who waits to 70 can receive one about 24 percent above it. On the same earnings record, the age-70 benefit can be well over 70 percent larger than the age-62 benefit — a gap that lasts for life and grows with each annual cost-of-living adjustment, since the raises are applied to the larger base.
How to decide when to claim
The right claiming age depends on your health, your other income, and whether you are still working. Someone who needs the money to cover basic expenses, or who has a serious health condition and a shorter life expectancy, may reasonably claim early despite the reduction. Someone with savings to bridge the gap, a long family history of longevity, or a spouse who will one day rely on a survivor benefit often comes out far ahead by waiting, because the higher benefit compounds over a long retirement and carries over to a surviving spouse.
Working while claiming early adds another wrinkle: before full retirement age, Social Security withholds part of the benefit if your earnings exceed an annual limit, which can make early claiming while employed especially inefficient. Once you reach 67, you can earn any amount with no reduction. You can compare your own projected benefits at 62, 67, and 70 through a free my Social Security account, which shows your personalized estimates side by side.
The takeaway for a retirement plan
The claiming decision deserves deliberate thought rather than a reflexive filing at 62. For many people with the means to wait, delaying even a few years meaningfully raises lifetime income and better protects a surviving spouse. For others, claiming early is the sensible or necessary choice. What matters is knowing the real numbers — a roughly 30 percent cut at 62, a full benefit at 67, and up to about 24 percent more at 70 — and choosing with those figures in front of you rather than discovering the cost of an early claim after it is permanent.
Why the survivor benefit tilts the math
For married couples, the claiming decision is not just about one person’s lifetime — it shapes what a surviving spouse will live on. When one spouse dies, the survivor generally keeps the larger of the two benefits, so a higher earner who delays claiming raises not only their own check but the amount their widow or widower may collect for the rest of their life. That is a powerful argument for the higher earner in a couple to wait toward 70 if they can, even if the lower earner claims earlier, because the delayed benefit effectively buys longevity insurance for whichever spouse lives longest.
The flip side is that health and cash needs are real and personal. Someone in poor health, or a household that needs the income to cover essentials now, may reasonably claim early despite the permanent reduction, and there is no shame in that — the “right” age is the one that fits your circumstances, not a formula. What matters is deciding with the actual numbers in view: a roughly 30 percent cut at 62, the full benefit at 67, and up to about 24 percent more at 70, plus the survivor effect for couples. You can see your personalized estimates at each age through a free my Social Security account and weigh them against your health, savings, and spouse’s situation before you file.
This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by a human editor. Figures are linked to their primary sources; where a claim could not be verified from the public record, we say so.
More Financial Reading
