Money, explained for the rest of us.

Get our free daily email →

Medicare barred 11 medical-supply companies over $3.4 billion in suspect billing, including charges filed for patients who had already died.

By

a pile of pills and money sitting on top of a table

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said this week it is cutting off future Medicare Advantage and Part D payments to 11 medical equipment suppliers tied to more than $3.4 billion in suspected fraudulent billing. The agency says all 11 companies billed for equipment supposedly provided to Medicare beneficiaries who had already died, among other red flags in their claims. For households on Medicare Advantage or Part D, the case is a reminder that fraud rides on the same billing system that generates your monthly statements, and that a careful read of your own paperwork is one of the few defenses a beneficiary actually controls.

CMS’s Preclusion List: Barred From Payment, Not a Criminal Conviction

CMS placed all 11 durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS) suppliers on its Preclusion List, an administrative roster the agency uses to cut off future Medicare Advantage and Part D payments to providers whose conduct it judges detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program. Being precluded is not the same as being convicted of a crime. CMS can add a supplier to the list because it has already been revoked from Medicare, because of a felony conviction within the past 10 years, or because the agency determines the underlying conduct would have justified revocation even without one. Once a supplier is precluded, the effect is automatic rather than punitive in the criminal sense: Medicare Advantage plans must deny payment for anything the supplier bills, and Part D sponsors must reject its prescription claims. The more than $3.4 billion figure in this action is what CMS calls suspected fraudulent billing, not a court-established loss total, and no criminal charges were announced alongside it.


Free retirement updates: Want plain-English help keeping more of your money in retirement? The free Retirement Shield newsletter covers the benefits, deadlines, and money mistakes that cost retirees, a couple times a week. Subscribe free.

Nearly $3.4 Billion in Suspected Billing Across 11 Suppliers

None of the 11 companies had submitted a Medicare claim before 2025, according to CMS, and each one built large billing volumes soon after enrolling. Being added to the Preclusion List is how CMS enforces that going forward, but the agency also used a separate, faster tool on some of the same suppliers: its original Medicare payment-suspension authority, which let it freeze roughly $24 million in suspected fraudulent billing before any of the money went out the door. In one case, a Florida-based supplier billed $6.1 million for catheters for 500 beneficiaries on December 15, 2025, then $12.3 million more for 777 beneficiaries the very next day; CMS suspended those payments rather than let them clear. A New Jersey firm was added to the Preclusion List after billing a Medicare Advantage plan for 38 separate encounters in which, CMS says, the beneficiary was already dead on the reported date of service, along with member complaints from people who said they never asked for the equipment. A separate Florida company is suspected of running a DME telemarketing operation that oversupplied equipment; several beneficiaries told CMS they never received the braces they were billed for and did not recognize the supplier’s name.

The Pattern: Billing for Medicare Patients Who Had Already Died

Every one of the 11 suppliers billed Medicare for multiple beneficiaries who were already deceased, CMS says, the common thread tying the cases together despite their different corporate names, states and equipment types. Billing for a deceased patient is not simply a bookkeeping slip. It typically means either the company generated a date of service after learning of the beneficiary’s death or falsified paperwork to make a stale claim look current. It also points to a company mining beneficiary information, Medicare numbers, addresses, ordering-provider details, without delivering care, since a supplier shipping real equipment to a real household has little reason to also bill for people who can no longer receive it.

Four Suppliers Were Already Kicked Out of Original Medicare

Four of the 11 suppliers had already been revoked from Original Medicare before this action, CMS says, and responded by shifting their billing to Medicare Advantage plans instead, a pathway the agency is now trying to close. The timing lines up with a broader enforcement push: CMS’s own figures show total Medicare program integrity savings rose 59% year over year, from $26.3 billion in fiscal 2025 to $41.9 billion, with the agency crediting expanded data analytics for catching suspicious billing earlier. A moratorium on new DME supplier enrollment in several risk categories ended August 27, 2026, and CMS says a new prior-authorization step for certain DMEPOS equipment begins October 15, 2026, aimed at screening newly enrolled suppliers before their first claim rather than after their five-hundredth.

Reading Your Own Medicare Summary Notice for These Red Flags

None of this money came out of a beneficiary’s pocket directly, but every dollar CMS blocks is a dollar that doesn’t drain the Medicare Trust Fund that current and future beneficiaries depend on, and every dollar that slips through can eventually show up in higher costs across the system. The most direct thing a household can do is read its own Medicare Summary Notice or Medicare Advantage plan statement line by line rather than filing it away unopened. If a notice shows a supplier’s name that’s unfamiliar, an item that was never delivered, or a date of service for care that happened after a family member’s death, that’s worth reporting rather than assuming it’s a clerical error. CMS’s own case notes describe beneficiaries who did exactly that, telling investigators they had never heard of the company billing their account, and those interviews became part of the evidence that got suppliers precluded.

This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by a human editor. Figures are linked to their primary sources; where a claim could not be verified from the public record, we say so.

More Financial Reading


Spotted an error? Tell us at [email protected]. We fix mistakes fast and in the open — see how we work on our standards page.

Get the money news that affects your wallet — free, every weekday morning.

Benefits, taxes, and savings, explained in plain English. Get the free newsletter.

Free from Retirement Shield. Unsubscribe anytime. We never ask for money.